Maryland Dog Bite Lawyer — Free Consultation

Strict Liability State

Maryland presumes a dog owner knew their dog could be dangerous — but Maryland is also one of only five U.S. jurisdictions where any fault of your own, even one percent, can bar your claim completely.

Your Rights After a Dog Bite in Maryland

Maryland dog bite law changed twice in a decade, and a lot of what is written about it online is still describing the version that existed in between. In 2012, the state's highest court ruled that pit bulls were "inherently dangerous" and made both owners and their landlords strictly liable regardless of the individual dog's history. The legislature reversed that in April 2014, replacing it with a breed-neutral statute, Cts. & Jud. Proc. § 3-1901, that applies the same way no matter what kind of dog was involved.

What that statute actually gives a claimant is a rebuttable presumption: any proof the dog caused the injury creates a presumption the owner knew or should have known the dog was dangerous, and a judge cannot rule that presumption overcome before a jury decides. Separately, an owner is strictly liable, full stop, for injuries caused by a dog running at large, with narrow exceptions for trespassers, criminal conduct against a person, and provoking the dog.

The catch sits outside the statute entirely. Maryland is one of only four states plus Washington, D.C. that still applies pure contributory negligence — meaning any fault on the claimant's part, even a small amount, bars recovery completely rather than reducing it proportionally the way it would in most states. A claim that would be a clean six-figure case in California or Missouri can be worth nothing in Maryland if the dog's owner can show you contributed to what happened at all.

What a Maryland dog bite attorney is actually being paid to do, in most cases, is manage that risk: building a record that forecloses a contributory negligence argument before the insurance company builds one of its own, documenting exactly what happened in the moments before the bite while it is still fresh, and pursuing the landlord separately where a tenant's dog was involved and the landlord had knowledge and control under Matthews v. Amberwood, 351 Md. 544 (1998).

Fees follow the standard contingency structure: nothing upfront, typically around a third of any recovery, paid only out of what is actually recovered. If there is no recovery, there is typically no fee owed, and case costs are usually advanced by the firm and reimbursed from the settlement.

Timelines vary with how contested the contributory negligence question is. A claim where the dog was clearly running at large with no plausible fault argument against the victim can resolve in months. A claim where the owner has any basis to argue you contributed — approached the dog, entered a yard, did not step back quickly enough — takes considerably longer, because that argument threatens the entire recovery rather than a percentage of it.

Not every Maryland bite needs a lawyer. A minor wound, prompt treatment, no lasting mark, and an insurer paying without dispute is a claim many people can resolve themselves. What changes that calculation: any suggestion at all that you did something to contribute to the attack, a child victim (who benefits from Maryland's reduced standard for minors), a bite from a tenant's dog where a landlord may share liability, an insurance denial citing a breed exclusion, or a fatal attack.

The evidence worth preserving either way: photographs of the wound taken immediately and through healing, photographs of the location showing exactly where the dog was and where you were standing, a written account of the minutes before the bite while memory is fresh, the owner's name, address and insurance information, and the official bite report and quarantine record.

Maryland's District Court handles small claims up to $5,000 without formal rules of evidence, a reasonable option for a minor bite with modest bills and no contested contributory negligence question. Anything involving surgery, scarring, a landlord dispute, or any suggestion of claimant fault belongs in circuit court and generally belongs with an attorney, because Maryland's contributory negligence rule is exactly the kind of issue that is costly to get wrong without one.

Maryland Dog Bite Laws

Any page written about Maryland dog bite law before 2014, and a surprising number written since, still describe pit bulls as automatically strictly liable animals in Maryland with landlords on the hook alongside the owner. That was true for roughly two years and has not been true since April 2014. The 43rd governor signed emergency legislation abrogating Tracey v. Solesky entirely and replacing it with a rule that applies identically to every breed. Citing the 2012 case as current law is one of the most common and most consequential errors in Maryland dog bite content, because it gets both the liability standard and the landlord question wrong.

Full breakdown of the statute, comparative negligence rules, and exceptions: Maryland Dog Bite Laws →

What Compensation Can You Recover?

Economic damages are the documented costs: emergency and follow-up medical treatment, rabies post-exposure prophylaxis where given, reconstructive or revision surgery, physical therapy, and wages lost during recovery.

Non-economic damages cover pain and suffering, emotional distress, and permanent scarring or disfigurement. Maryland places no general statutory cap on non-economic damages in an ordinary dog bite claim against a private owner.

Most Maryland claims are paid from the dog owner's homeowners or renters insurance, typically with limits between $100,000 and $300,000. Under Md. Code, Ins. § 19-206.1, an insurer that excludes specific breeds must give the policyholder written notice naming those breeds — a denial based on an undisclosed breed exclusion is worth checking against that requirement rather than accepted as final.

A child's claim carries the usual scarring-valuation premium and, separately, a meaningfully reduced exposure to Maryland's contributory negligence rule: children under five cannot be found contributorily negligent at all, and older minors are judged against a standard reflecting a reasonable child of similar age rather than an adult standard.

See typical dollar ranges: Maryland Settlement Amounts →

Steps to Take After a Dog Bite

Maryland's first steps are shaped by one overriding priority: foreclosing any contributory negligence argument before the insurance company can build one. Get medical care immediately — dog bites carry a real infection risk from Pasteurella and Capnocytophaga, and a same-day record anchors the claim. Then write down, in detail, exactly what you were doing in the moment before the bite, while the memory is fresh — because in Maryland, unlike almost anywhere else on this site, even minor fault on your part can end the claim entirely rather than reduce it. Photograph the wound and the location, including where the dog was relative to any fence, leash or enclosure. Get the owner's name, address, phone number and insurance information; if a landlord may be involved because the dog belonged to a tenant, note the property management company's name as well. Report the bite — in Baltimore City that routes through 311, and other Maryland jurisdictions maintain their own animal control departments — which starts the rabies quarantine and creates an official record independent of what the owner later tells their insurer. Be careful with recorded statements to any adjuster: a question about exactly where you were standing or what you were doing is not small talk in a contributory negligence state, it is the defense being built in real time.

Statute of Limitations

Maryland gives three years from the date of the injury to file a personal injury claim, under the state's general civil statute of limitations, Cts. & Jud. Proc. § 5-101. For a minor, § 5-201 tolls the period during minority, so the three years generally begins running on the child's 18th birthday — giving a minor until roughly their 21st birthday to file. A wrongful death claim from a fatal attack runs on its own separate three-year clock under § 3-904(g), measured from the date of death rather than the date of the attack, which matters where a victim survives the initial attack for a period before dying. Two further exceptions can extend the ordinary period: fraudulent concealment of the injury by the responsible party tolls the clock until discovery, and the limitations period does not run while a defendant has left Maryland, resuming only once they return. None of these extensions address the more immediate risk in a Maryland claim, which is evidentiary rather than a matter of the calendar: because any degree of claimant fault can bar recovery entirely under Maryland's pure contributory negligence rule, the facts establishing exactly what happened in the moments before the bite need to be locked down early, well before the three-year deadline becomes the operative concern.

Full breakdown of the statute, its exceptions, and how shared fault is handled: Maryland dog bite laws →

Find a Dog Bite Lawyer Near You in Maryland

• Baltimore Dog Bite Lawyer